Justin Barki vs Karol Filar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Nov at 04:34 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Barki vs K. Filar

INA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

POL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Barki 0 - 1 Filar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Justin Barki winning 0 and Karol Filar winning 2. The last match between Karol Filar and Justin Barki was at the M15 Kuala Lumpur, 14-11-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Karol Filar getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Barki | 0 |
| Filar | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Kuala Lumpur(11-14-25)
J. Barki vs K. Filar H2H Profile
J. Barki vs K. Filar Match Preview:
- In recent form, Justin Barki’s second serve win percentage stands at 40.43%, slightly lower than Karol Filar’s 41.60%. Which player has the advantage here? Karol Filar, though marginally, as higher second serve performance can often influence match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Filar excels with a 46.99% win rate compared to Barki's 39.09%. Is Filar likely to maintain dominance in return games? Yes, Filar’s edge in returning can pressure Barki's serve more effectively.
- On first serve returns, Filar again outshines with 29.43% against Barki’s 24.15%. What does this suggest? Filar’s superior return game further strengthens his positional advantage over Barki.
- Despite having a lower breakpoint save rate of 51.28%, Filar’s consistent overall performance suggests resilience. Meanwhile, Barki saves 63.16% under pressure, indicating he might hold serve better in critical moments.
- Filar has a superior win-loss record for the past year at 61.11% compared to Barki’s 50.00%. Does this suggest a stronger recent form? Indeed, Filar shows a trend of stronger match consistency and success rates.
- Examining surface preferences, Barki performs best on hard courts with a 43% win rate, equal to Filar's best on clay. What implications do these preferences have? The surface alignment suggests an equal footing for both on neutral surfaces.
- Direct head-to-head records show Filar’s clear dominance with a previous win against Barki. Does history suggest a psychological edge? Yes, Filar’s earlier victories might grant him confidence and psychological leverage.
- Barki has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents (average rank 377.38) compared to Filar (average rank 402.89) recently. Does this mean Barki is more battle-hardened? Potentially, as engaging tougher opponents might provide Barki with critical experience.
- If the match stretches to a deciding set, Filar boasts a slightly better performance, winning 38% compared to Barki's 33%. Does Filar’s higher rate indicate superior endurance? Yes, Filar might possess a slight edge in handling high-pressure situations.
Editorial Prediction (November 14, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the current statistics and recent performance trends, both players show unique strengths. Justin Barki displays resilience under pressure, particularly when saving breakpoints. His extensive competition against tougher opponents might have honed his game further.
Nevertheless, Karol Filar's superiority in both return games and past direct encounters positions him as the frontrunner. With his higher win percentage over the past year and experience in winning critical sets, Filar appears to have a more consistent competitive edge.
While Justin Barki is undeniably competitive, the statistical pointers favor Karol Filar as the likely winner in the upcoming tennis match.
Justin Barki vs Karol Filar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Barki vs K. Filar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Recent Performance Stats
J. Barki Recent Matches Played
K. Filar Recent Matches Played

J. Barki vs K. Filar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 42.31% (33/45) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.76% (57/40) |
| 41.86% (72/100) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.27% (126/94) |
| 47.71% (811/889) | Games Win/Loss | 52.39% (1109/1008) |
| 42.67% (32/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.52% (50/34) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 261 | Aces Total | 155 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 142 | Total Double Faults | 173 |
| 1:29:51 | Average Match Time | 1:6:16 |
| 464.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 351.21 |
| 62% (2848/4626) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2759/4396) |
| 69% (1976/2848) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1851/2759) |
| 49% (863/1778) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (780/1637) |
| 37% (155/423) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (180/444) |
| 36% (1678/4605) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1746/4340) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 41.89% (31/43) | Futures W/L | 59.38% (57/39) |
| 41% (31/76) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (57/97) |
| 43% (12/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 82% (14/17) |
| 56% (10/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (14/26) |
| 87% (30/26) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (55/49) |
| 13% (30/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (55/6) |
| 13% (48/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (42/8) |